StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice - Admission/Application Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The rule of law governing suppression of evidence is the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution. The paper "The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice" discusses lawful suppositions drawn from facts that are in error may lead to an invalidation of a suppression court…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.6% of users find it useful
The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice"

The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage PracticeThe rule of law governing suppression of evidence seized pursuant to a search is the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution that provides under the exclusionary rules that, “Evidence obtained through a violation of the Fourth Amendment is generally not admissible by the prosecution during the defendant’s criminal trial” (Constitution). Lawful suppositions drawn from facts that are in error may lead to an invalidation of a suppression court.

A case in which the suppression of evidence seized in the effecting has been pleaded is Commonwealth v. DeMichel, 442pa, 553, 277 A.2d 159 (1971). In this case, the police apprehended the appellant’s premises and seized money, cocaine and female attire. The litigant and his son were charged with dissimilar wrongdoings. The litigant filed a motion to suppress the physical substantiation seized pursuant to the search as the police had violated the “knock and announce” rule. The court provided that, “Our scope or review in evaluating the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence is to determine whether the factual findings of the suppression court are supported by the record.

Assuming that there is support in the record, we are bound by the facts as are found and we may reverse the suppression court only if the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are in error. Thus, if sufficient evidence is of record to support the suppression court’s ruling and that court has not misapplied the law, we will not substitute our credibility determination for that of the suppression court judge.” There is sufficient proof in this matter showing that the permissible conclusions gotten from the particulars are in error.

In addition, there is evidence that the police knocked the door once, shouted, waited for 15 seconds and then kicked the door open and searched the premises. There is sufficient proof that Clavel has hardship in hearing. There is sufficient evidence that Clavel was approaching to unlock the door when the police kicked it in. If the rule of law presented in DeMichel is followed, it appears that there is sufficient evidence to support that the facts available were found in error. There is no Pennsylvania case law that contradicts DeMichel or establishes a different definition of facts found in error.

A possible counterargument is that the police applied the knocked and announce rule before gaining forceful entrance into the premises. The time they took was, however, too short. There is no case law to support this position. It may be necessary to look for additional evidence that shows the police knocked and announced repetitively before forcing entrance. Look at the recommendations below.ConclusionThe exclusionary rule under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits admissibility of evidence by the prosecution during the defendant’s criminal trial.

The matter between Commonwealth v. Marinelli states that a law enforcement officer executing a search warrant shall, before entry, give, or make reasonable effort to give, notice of his identity, authority and purpose to any occupant of the premises specified in the warrant, unless exigent circumstances require his immediate forcible entry. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides for the exclusionary clause. In Commonwealth v. DeMichel, the court affirmed the judgment of sentence.

In our case, there is no evidence that there was repeated knocking and announcing. Therefore, it appears there is sufficient proof that the evidence was obtained in error.Recommendations1. We need to determine whether the immediate forcible access was indispensable to ignore the exceptions of the knock and announce rule.2. We need to conduct further investigations on whether Clavel had difficulty in hearing and whether he was going to open the door.Works Cited“The Pocket Constitution.” 6 March 2011. U.S.

Constitution Online. October 16, 2011. Available at: .

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.)
The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice Admission/Application Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1581814-draft-second-office-memorandum
(The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice Admission/Application Essay)
The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice Admission/Application Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1581814-draft-second-office-memorandum.
“The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice Admission/Application Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1581814-draft-second-office-memorandum.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Fourth Amendment To The US Constitution In Arbitrage Practice

Constitutional Conventions. Should Conventions Be Made Into Laws

The origin of constitutional conventions also takes place when certain authorities try to exercise power which is actually not prohibited by law but a certain opposition is aroused against that exercise of power and the opposition is of such an extent that the same action cannot be taken in future and the opposition marks an end to that practice.... For example in the Indian subcontinent (Present India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh) the constitution is based on the Govt....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Should we have the Good Faith Exception extended to searches and seizures

The right against unreasonable searches and seizure is a protected right in the fourth amendment.... the fourth amendment states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

From Arrest to Adjudication

From Arrest to Adjudication Instructor name: Unit Name Abstract the fourth amendment of United States constitution states that people have the right to be safe in their houses, effects and papers, as well as against unreasonable searches and seizures.... Earlier on many searches were conducted without any justification and therefore, the fourth amendment was formed to guard against the police intrusions.... the fourth amendment, states that people have the right to be safe in their papers, houses, effects, and persons against unfair seizures and searches....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Evidence and Due Process: Evaluate Evidence Collection Protocol

the fourth amendment of the United States (US) constitution protects individuals from arbitrary arrest, search and seizure by law enforcement authorities, and limits the circumstances in which a court of law can issue a valid warrant of arrest and/or search (Colb, 2011).... Failing to observe the provisions of the fourth amendment in the collection of evidence leads to the disqualification of this evidence in a court proceeding.... Suppression of evidence through the exclusionary rule serves to teach and help law enforcement officers learn the implications of contravening the fourth amendment (FBI, nd)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Prosecutorial Misconduct in Texas

This paper seeks to discuss prosecutorial misconduct in Texas, describes prohibitions that prosecutor must adhere to, they include not tampering with a witness for a purpose of gaining ground to a particular case.... … In the modern world, prosecutor's role starts from the start of the investigation to the conclusion of the trial....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Americans Constitutional Rights for Privacy

Critics have assailed it as a draconian Act as it augmented the mechanism of the intelligence agencies to initiate drastic steps against terrorism, offering them with unlimited power to record, keep eavesdropping of, and to supervise those involved in suspected planning and indulging in terrorist attacks in the us soil.... SIGINT is the signal intelligence which involves collection data from foreign intelligence agencies, for helping missions carried over by the us government which includes narcotic and crime deterrence, military missions, foreign diplomacy, etc....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Constitution Convention in the UK

hellip; The author explains that constitutional conventions originate in the case where there is no regulation to prohibit the practice of a given type of power may bring rise to opposition inhibiting future similar occasion.... Constitutional conventions originate in the case where there is no regulation to prohibit the practice of a given type of power may bring rise to opposition inhibiting future similar occasion.... The aim of the paper “constitution Convention in the UK” is to examine constitution convection, which is a rule that cannot be enforced by a court of law....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Analysis of Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 Case

constitution, which is applicable to the states through the constitutions Fourteenth Amendment.... Ballew was convicted for his crime under the Georgia law but he appeared before the Court of Appeal of the state of Georgia claiming that a trial before a jury compromising of less than six jury persons was unconstitutional; the evidence warranting his conviction was insufficient and the film showed was not obscene as per the First amendment.... n making it it's ruling, the Supreme Court held that a five bench jury doesn't meet the constitutional threshold guarantee as stipulated by the Sixth amendment of the U....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us