StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

United States vs Recio - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The case sets a new precedence in the definition and limit of conspiracy. This is due to the vote of conviction on two trials. The case further highlighted the inconsistencies in the interpretation of the law and the use of wrong precedence to determine similar cases. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
United States vs Recio
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "United States vs Recio"

Download file to see previous pages

The two drivers help the police arrest two other individuals, Recio and Meza, the defendants in this case. The two truck drivers are found in possession of the illegal drugs together with Recio and Meza who come for the drugs, rounded up and charged with conspiracy to commit a criminal offence of distributing illegal drugs (www.oyez.org). It is clear that the two drivers were part of the conspiracy because they were actually found with the drugs. However, it requires careful interpretation of the law to determine whether Recio and Meza who are only arrested after police lays a sting by the help of the truck drivers, are also guilty of the offense.

The two, Recio and Meza, are tried in the Supreme Court and the jury find them guilty of conspiracy. The trial Judge advises that the precedence on similar case and the law dictates that conspiracy ends when its object is defeated by the government and so joining conspiracy scheme after seizure would be meaningless since the object of conspiracy would be impossible to achieve in such circumstances. Based on this, the trial judge orders a new trial and the new jury are advised on the circumstances of the seizure so as to be able to establish whether or not, Recio and Meza, joined the conspiracy before the seizure.

The Constitutional Issues in the Case Following the trial on the two counts of charges presented against the defendants, Jimenez Recio and Adrian Lopez i.e. possession of illegal drugs- marijuana and cocaine and the charge on distribution of illegal drugs, several constitutional issues emerge. It is clear that, there is an issue on the interpretation of the law of conspiracy as to when someone is deemed to have conspired. The law herein dictates that a person can only be found guilty of conspiracy if it can be proved that the person entered into conspiracy, before withdrawal of such intention or before the object of conspiracy was defeated by government intervention and the object became difficult to achieve.

The state fails to prove this but the defendants are found guilty by the jury on both trials. There is also a constitutional issue that emerges from the trial judge in the Supreme Court during the first trial, from an error in the jury instruction. The jury are not adequately informed on the requirement of the law in relation to the case before them. The jury is not advised on which circumstance the defendants are guilty of the charges and so they pass a verdict on the defendants being guilty without actually being able to ascertain their involvement in the conspiracy.

The other issue that emerge is the precedence on similar case notably United States versus Cruz and United States versus Castro which had similar circumstances but the courts argued that they joined the conspiracy when its object had been defeated and thus became impossible to achieve. If this was the case that was referred to, then the state had to provide evidence showing the involvement of Recio and Adriano Lopez to the conspiracy of drug possession with intent to distribution. This was obviously not achieved during the two trials at the Supreme Court.

The precedence on other cases provides a guideline and benchmark for ruling on subsequent cases. Decision of the case in terms of the vote In this case, the jury found the defendants guilty of both charges in a vote of 8 for guilty with 1 vote against the state, and thus becoming a unanimous vote. The defendants appealed against the vote and the case was remanded to the court of appeal which ruled that the conviction of guilty for both charges be removed. This was basing its argument on

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“United States vs Recio Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1447385-pol-supreme-court-case-summary
(United States Vs Recio Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1447385-pol-supreme-court-case-summary.
“United States Vs Recio Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1447385-pol-supreme-court-case-summary.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF United States vs Recio

Stereotyping of Latina Women in the United States

hellip; In the united states there are many people of assorted family backgrounds, races, social classes and religions; it is one of the most cosmopolitan countries if not the most cosmopolitan one.... Stereotyping is not considered a negative quality but it does put into hot water those who are subjected to it....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Judicial Activism - Roper v Simmons

This case has since been heard by the united states Supreme Courts.... The Court's majority states that twenty-two of thirty-seven death penalty states permit the death penalty for the offenders that are sixteen years old.... The same thirty-seven states permitted the death penalty for those offenders that were seventeen years old....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Mississippi Burning: Ku Klux Klan vs. FBI

Any act committed within the jurisdiction of the united states that is dangerous to human life and becomes a violation of the criminal laws of a state or of the united states is considered domestic terrorism (U.... In the paper “Mississippi Burning: Ku Klux Klan vs.... vs.... hellip; The author states that Parker continues his interpretation of the very real events in 1964 by showing southern whites as ignorant, violent hate-mongers, with no concern for human life, and blacks as silent martyrs....
3 Pages (750 words) Movie Review

Geckos as Pets

Pets serve many needs for humans - from teaching responsibility to a young child to keeping a single adult company to just plain being a source of entertainment.... Most people, when thinking of what type of pet to get, will normally think in terms of traditional animals such as dogs and cats, maybe birds or even small rodents....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Irish Immigration: The Similarities and Differences of Migrating in America and Canada

This compelled Irish to leave their country and look for their fate and luck to other countries, mostly in the united states and Canada.... Irish migrated to prosperous countries such as the united states... It became officially absorbed as part of united Kingdom after the Act of Union on January 1, 1801 (Moving Here Ireland in the 19th century, par2)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Customized - (Will be sent in an e-mail as an attachment)

This case has since been heard by the united states Supreme Courts.... The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment against those in the united states.... The Court's majority states that twenty-two of thirty-seven death penalty states permit the death penalty for the offenders that are sixteen years old.... The same thirty-seven states permitted the death penalty for...
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Criminal justice careers

According to this article, federal judges are nominated by the president of the united states of America and subsequently confirmed by the Senate.... isplay&group=ga&set=CJC&ruleid=gacjc3 Canon 3 is a legal code in the State of Washington that states “A judge shall not carry out the Judge's extrajudicial and personal activities to reduce the risk of conflict with the obligations of judicial office” (Cecil 2006)....
1 Pages (250 words) Research Paper

Compare and contrast US health system

The Canadian… On the other hand, the united states has an open health care system with numerous players typified with private systems.... On the other hand, the united states has an open health care system with numerous players typified with private systems.... As opposed to Canada, united states has no single health care system across the nation.... The united states health care system has varied production techniques as opposed to the Canadian system....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us