StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Drug Abuse Costs - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The "Drug Abuse Costs" paper states that every policy is that the cost per person must be collated with the success rate. Essentially this step demands statistical rigor rather than psychological experience and this final calculation is the key to this entire proposal…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Drug Abuse Costs
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Drug Abuse Costs"

Running head: Drug Abuse Costs Drug Abuse Costs James Sedlar ENG 102 Barton October 25, 2009 Reducing Health Care Costs Relating to Alcoholand Drug Abuse Billions of dollars are spent annually on reducing drug abuse; analysts at the University of California, San Francisco estimate that the total cost of alcohol and drug abuse to be $166 billion annually (GAO, 1998, p. 2). In lieu of this situation and current attempts of both Canada and the United States to control health-care costs, a more analytical intensive policy from an existing and widely accepted therapy resulting in lower program costs and more successful program outcomes is crucial in delivering treatment which achieves the goal shared by all sectors involved in health care. The therapy subject to consideration in this proposal is Cognitive therapy which “attempts to identify and define maladaptive thoughts or beliefs” that contribute to addiction and/or relapse (Holder, et al., 1996, p. 520). Cognitive therapy is delivered in a variety of treatment modalities that range from inpatient and residential facilities to outpatient programs. Langenbucher (1996) identifies analytical tools that can be used to identify the value of treatment for drug and alcohol abuse that succinctly addresses program costs. Some elements included in his framework are cost-of-illness, cost-offset and cost-benefit analyses which focus on the cost of the disease if it is left untreated. This type of analysis endeavors to identify the costs, both covert and explicit, that accompanies addiction in terms of decreased productivity and unemployment, future healthcare costs, and increased demands on the criminal justice and social services systems. Alternately, cost-effectiveness analyses “compare two or more treatments by determining the cost of a given desirable outcome using each treatment” (Langenbucher, 1996, p. 2). A disclaimer however on this framework: Langenbucher’s analysis also compares the cost of treatment to the benefits that accrue, that is, the success that can be measured after the treatment. While there is a general consensus that successful treatment is economically viable when compared to the costs of continued addiction, there is little consensus as to which types of treatment are most efficacious. Thus cost-effectiveness should also take into consideration success rates of alternate types of treatment and this will be expounded on further later. The costs of cognitive therapy programs vary considerably. According to Holder, et. al. in-patient treatment costs as much as $300 per day while the out-patient treatment may cost as little as $34 per day. Thus, inpatient or residential treatment may cost as much as ten times that of outpatient treatment. At present there is a body of data that outlines the costs of various treatment options. The cost of a specific treatment program can be determined by noting its cost or price (how much it bills public or private insurers or the individual in question). This applies to both inpatient and outpatient programs. If this figure is then divided by the duration of the program (in the case of inpatient treatment) or the number of visits or events constituting the program (in the case of outpatient programs) one has a set of economic data that is conducive to meaningful contrast and comparison. This is the method employed most frequently in the existing research. (Chapman and Hutgens, 1988; O’Neill, 1991) Meaningful analysis of program outcomes, on the other hand, demands that the characteristics of the subjects be determined at their entry into treatment; after all it is through proper assessment that an institution knows if its policies are successful or not. The Form 90 questionnaire is frequently employed to reconstruct alcohol consumption. Form 90 assesses alcohol consumption on the basis of a timeline follow-back method (TLFB) that chronicles daily usage over a 90 day period and a grid averaging method that identifies patterns of usage (i.e. ‘binge’ drinking as opposed to daily consumption). Additionally, Form 90 quantifies several related domains such as institutionalization, residential status and health care utilization. According to Tonigan et. al. when Form 90 is administered by “intensively trained interviewers, who follow manual-guided procedures” it “provides reliable estimates of alcohol consumption and related variables and represents one of several structured assessment procedures to quantify drinking behavior” (1997, p. 364). In addition to Form 90 a variety of other assessment tools of proven accuracy are available to assess the constellation of issues that surround simple consumption patterns. Timko et. al. (1999) indicate that the Health and Daily Living (HDL) Form, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and the Life Stressors and Social Resources Inventory all provide sound and valid analysis of issues such as self-esteem, depression and stress that provide valuable baseline data. Therefore, both alcohol usage and related issues can be adequately measured as a baseline and throughout the study. With that said, this literature clearly establishes the costs of cognitive therapy treatment programs and it also identifies a variety of tools that can be employed to determine the characteristics of subjects identified as alcohol dependent which can also be used to assess treatment outcomes. In a remarkably soft report the Government Accounting Office concluded that treatment probably had some beneficial effect: “Drug abuse treatment is beneficial, but reliance on self-reported data may overstate treatment effectiveness….objective tests, such as urinalysis, consistently identify more drug users than self-reports do”(GAO, 1998). This then leads us to the conclusion that the specificity and accuracy of the data from simple questionnaires is sorely lacking. Additionally, little data relating outcome rates to treatment costs is available and even less of this data is then employed to compare different treatment programs or modalities. In other words, research into treatment outcomes is deficient and research into the cost-effectiveness of treatment alternatives is virtually non existent. Analysis of the relative cost-effectiveness of two treatment modalities requires the generation of two related sets of statistics, focusing on two independent variables. Initially, the cost of treatment must be determined. Subsequently the success rate of the treatment modality in question must be determined and finally, this data must be correlated and compared. For example, let us assume that inpatient treatment is five times as expensive as outpatient treatment. Only if the former is five times as effective as the latter is it cost-effective. If outpatient treatment can be delivered at one-fifth of the cost of inpatient treatment with a success rate that is half that of inpatient programs then the cost-effective approach is the outpatient treatment. While it is less effective in absolute terms it significantly lowers costs rendering it more cost-effective. It is also more appropriate to consider the cost of the total treatment program rather than the cost per day or per event. For example, per day or per event comparison is only valid if the two programs involve an equal number of days and events. It would be more accurate to view the cost of the total treatment regimen rather than an event/day comparison and thus a comparison of a 28-day inpatient program with a 52-event (i.e. weekly for one year) outpatient program would be more meaningful if the total cost of the program, rather than when the per day and per event costs were compared. However, definition and determination of the effectiveness of treatment is a more elusive goal. In the first place, the level of addiction of the individuals comprising the two sample groups must be comparable. If individuals who participate in outpatient programs are less alcohol dependent than those in inpatient programs then there is little basis for comparison. Therefore, any comparative analysis must commence by assessing the usage patterns and relative dependence of the two samples, hence the deference again lies in the methodology of collecting data of the treatments’ outcomes. Form 90 was identified earlier but there are constellations of commonly employed and widely accepted tests that take into account a variety of related mood and personality issues. It is important therefore to include a measure of alcohol usage over time and a measure of functioning and mood to determine the comparability of those involved in inpatient and outpatient cognitive therapy. Application of these measures would permit the study groups to be divided into comparable levels of dependency. Thus, the group could be divided into highly dependent, dependent and limited dependent groups whose treatment outcomes could then be more meaningfully compared. Participants should also receive this battery of tests prior to, upon completion of, and subsequent to treatment. This study group would be initially tested to determine baseline levels and categorize participants. The tests would be delivered again 3 months after the commencement of treatment, one year after the baseline testing, and two years after that. Since ‘relapse’ and a return to dependency is a frequent occurrence with alcoholics, two years is considered a minimum period for follow-up. The question of follow up, specifically the duration of testing is an ongoing debate. Ideally, testing would be conducted as frequently and for a long a period of time as possible but this would lead us back again to the question of program costs. Funding restrictions and other considerations prohibit the infinite testing of participants despite its desirability. Ultimately, cost-effectiveness amounts to, in crude terms, the cost per successful outcome. This data reveals a wide range of interesting outcomes at this point. For example, unless the success rate of residential treatment is at least 30% it cannot possibly be as cost-effective as outpatient treatment. Alternately, even if outpatient treatment only demonstrates a success rate of 8% it is more cost-effective than in-patient treatment unless in-patient treatment maintains a success rate exceeding 40%. Finally, what is vital to every policy is that the cost per person must be collated with the success rate. Essentially this step demands statistical rigor rather than psychological experience and this final calculation is the key to this entire proposal. This paper then gives valuable insight: First, programs with significantly different rates of successful outcomes may be closely linked and compared in terms of cost-effectiveness. Following from that, it reinforces the point that cost-effectiveness rather than simply outcome rates is the most important measure of a program’s value. Cost-effectiveness analysis then becomes a central analytical tool in social services which can be employed in a variety of social services programs. References Chapman, PLH, and Hutgens, I. (1988) “An evaluation of three treatment programs for alcoholism” British Journal of Addiction 83: 67-81. “Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS)” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 11: 211-323, (1997). Ginzberg, HM. (1978) “Defensive Research—the Treatment Outcome Prospective Study (TOPS)” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 311: 265-269. Government (US) Accounting Office Report (1998). Drug abuse—Research shows treatment is effective, but benefits may be overstated. General Accounting Office, Health, Education, and Human Services Division Washington, D.C. Retrieved from the World Wide Web http://www.elibrary.com/s/edumark. Groenveld, J; Shain, M; Brayshaw, D; Keaney, J and L Laird (1985) “Cost effectiveness of EAP: Testing assumptions” Employee Assistance Quarterly 1: 75-81. Harwood, HJ; Thomson, M; Nesmith, T. (1994) Healthcare reform and substance abuse treatment: The cost of financing under alternative approaches Lewin-VHI Fairfax, VA. Holder, HD. (1987) Alcoholism treatment and potential health care cost savings Med Care 25: 52-71. Holder, H; Longabaugh R; Miller, WR and Rubonis, AV. (1991) “The cost effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: A first approximation” Journal of Studies on Alcohol 52: 517-540. Hubbard, RL. (1992) “Evaluation and Treatment Outcome” Substance Abuse: A Comprehensive Textbook 2nd ed. Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD, pp. 596-611. Hubbard, RL et al. (n.d.) Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill, NC. Kristenson, H; Ohlin, H; Hulter-Nosslin, H; Trell, E and B Hood. (1989) “Identification and intervention of heavy drinking in middle-aged men: Results and follow-up of 24-60 months of long-term study with randomized controls” Alcoholism 14: 203-209. Langenbucher, JamesW (1996) socioeconomic analysis of addictions treatment. Public Health Reports. Retrieved from the World Wide Web http://www.elibrary.com/s/edumark. McCrady, B; Longabaugh, R; Fink, E; Stout, R and A Ruggieri-Authelet. (1986) “Cost-effectiveness of alcoholism treatment in partial hospital versus inpatient settings after brief inpatient treatment: 12-month outcomes” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 54: 708-713. National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. (1997) The National Treatment Evaluation Study (NTIES)—Final Report Prepared for the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, SAMHSA, in collaboration with the Research Triangle Institute, 03/97. O’Neill, D. (1991) “The costs of addiction treatment” Employee Assistance Program Journal 15: 6-26. Simpson, DD and SB Sells. (1992) “Effectiveness of Treatment for Drug Abuser: An evaluation of the Drug Abuse Reporting Program (DARP) Research Program” Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse 2: 7-29. Simpson, DD. (1993) “Drug treatment evaluation research” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 7: 120-128. Tonigan, JS; Miller, WR; and Brown, JM. (1997) “the reliability of Form 90: An instrument for assessing alcohol treatment outcome’ Journal of Studies on Alcohol 58: 358-364. Vaillant, George E and Susanne Hiller-Sturmhofel. (1996) The natural history of alcoholism. Alcohol Health & Research World. Retrieved from the World Wide Web http://www.elibrary.com/s/edumark. Wilson, G. Terrance (1988) Alcohol use and abuse: A social learning analysis. In Theories on Alcoholism C D Chaudron and D A Wilkinson eds. (pp. 239-287). Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Drug Abuse Costs Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 4, n.d.)
Drug Abuse Costs Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 4. https://studentshare.org/health-sciences-medicine/1729056-proposal
(Drug Abuse Costs Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 4)
Drug Abuse Costs Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 4. https://studentshare.org/health-sciences-medicine/1729056-proposal.
“Drug Abuse Costs Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 4”. https://studentshare.org/health-sciences-medicine/1729056-proposal.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Drug Abuse Costs

Drug Profile and Abused Substances

hellip; Continuous abuse of these substances always leads to negative consequences which can even lead to loss of lives and reputation in social set up.... Alcohol is the second most widely used drug in... There are several substances which are abused in different capacities by people in attempt to achieve various luxuries....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Why people on goverment assistance should be drug tested to recieve assistance

The Governor explains that in order to avoid funding or subsidizing drug abuse by some of the individuals requesting for assistances from the government, drug testing must be done.... This shows that legislators are supporting drug tests on those asking for government assistances based on the idea of drug abuse by those who benefit from the package.... The process of drug test is also happening in Tennessee with the main focus being drug abuse by the individuals requesting for government assistance....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Drug Use in the Work Place

drug abuse also does not just affect the person taking the drugs, it tends to have a ripple effect that can spread beyond a person's work or family life.... Not only can drug abuse cost a person their job, and possibly time in jail, it can also cost them all their friends and family that surround them.... Drugs are dangerous, and drug abuse can lead to any of these problems.... But drug abuse can also lead to one other problem, a fatal problem....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The use of Cocaine and how it affects our society

If the individual is effecting by the abuse of cocaine, this can in turn produce devastating effect on the society at the same time.... Cocaine is a very powerful… This kind of drug increases the behavior that leads to its use.... The family suffers along with the drug addict through their ups and downs....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Maternal Child Patients with Heroin Addiction

rg/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Ethics/At_Risk_Drinking_and_Illicit_Drug_Use_Ethical_Issues_in_Obstetric_and_Gynecologic_Practice),Drug Abuse Costs are estimated at more than $180 billion yearly, including $605 million associated with health care costs for drug-exposed newborns (9).... A critical review of data on the prevention measure towards this healthcare policy requires further research  HEALTHCARE POLICYAssigned Policy: The low cost of heroin use has had a significant impact on maternal child patients, specifically leading to a drug withdrawal in newborns crisis....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Effects of Drug Abuse on Society

The paper "Effects of drug abuse on Society" describes that the cost of drug abuse together with addiction to the nation is too high and may get to unsustainable levels if not checked.... A huge percentage of admissions to hospitals consist of patients that have alcohol and drug abuse disorders resulting mostly from addiction.... Letter of Concern: Effects of drug abuse on SocietyDear Sir/ Madam,I write to you to express my concerns about the drugs and addiction issue in our society today....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

Yesterday is but today's memory, and tomorrow is today's dream

Today's media play a huge role in drug abuse.... On the hand, the economics effects of drug abuse include poverty, and increased health cost.... drug abuse has broken the dreams and ambitions of most youths.... Some of the program aim to raise the awareness on the effects of drug abuse while others involve the establishment of rehabilitation centers.... In short, most of the social evils are because of drug abuse in today's society....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Effects of Drugs Used by Parents on Infants or New Born Babies

drug abuse during pregnancy and after the birth of the babies may cause huge problems to the infants.... Physical problems such as birth defects and autism and psychological problems such as ADHD are believed to be the contributions of drug abuse by mothers during pregnancy and breastfeeding periods.... In fact, the major sufferers of one's drug abuse would be the society and family members.... In other words, drug abuse by the parents during pregnancy and after the birth of the child may have detrimental effects on the development of the infants....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us