The fate of Oedipus in the story can be described wholly as a story of fate. It turns around how nature controls events. In the story, the characters were fully aware of what was to befall them, as they were informed. After they had been informed of what their destinies had for them, they did not want to accept what was to follow. They put extra effort to try to change their fate. Unfortunately, the effort that was put had a direct effect that played a role in changing their fate. Hence, Oedipus had nothing to play in his destruction; fate played a major role in the destruction of Oedipus the King.
The concept of fatalism is deeply grounded on the individual premise that something powerful more than humanity exists controlling human lives. There lies a strong outside force that controls destiny. From the story, the fate of humankind lies on something beyond human control. The aspect of things being determined prior to birth is portrayed. Before the birth of Oedipus, his future was known and predetermined. It is critical to know that all prophecies in the story not only indicated the fate of Oedipus but also entailed the destiny of other people such as king Laius and Queen Jocasta.
In the play, it is evident through what Jocasta revealed, “An oracle Once came to Laius declaring he was doomed to perish by the hand of his own son.” It can also be that the destiny of Oedipus was fixed and could not be changed. Oedipus informed Jocasta what was foretold by the prophecy, “To wit, I should defile my mother’s bed…And slay the father from whose loins I sprang.”
Johnston, Ian. Fate, Freedom, and the Tragic Experience: An Introductory Lecture on Sophocles’s Oedipus the King. Aug. 2004. Malaspina University-College. 8 Dec. 2008.