StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Definition of the Democracy Concept - Literature review Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Definition of the Democracy Concept" paper examines the concept of democracy which is one that is largely misunderstood, misinterpreted, and misused by many. The resulting cloud of disarray comes in the backdrop of daily mentioning of the word and the concept in the media. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Definition of the Democracy Concept"

TIME TO TALK: DEMOCRACY Student’s Name Course Professor’s Name University City (State) Date Time to Talk: Democracy The concept of democracy is one that is largely misunderstood, misinterpreted, and misused by many. The resulting cloud of disarray comes in the backdrop of daily mentioning of the word and the concept in the media. Nonetheless, different people define democracy differently based on how the concept is used in their localities and what it means to them. To illustrate this, I asked three different people the question: "How do you define democracy?" Below are their responses. i. Person 1: “Democracy refers to a political structure in which the common people make laws and decisions for themselves.” [I would explain representative and pure forms of democracy, but I do not think that is the intention of your question]. ii. Person 2: “Democracy is a concept that entails power wrangles and struggles through regular elections while the citizens are used as a means of initiating these struggles through legitimate elections.” [The people do not really have a say in making the important decisions or laws like missile defence and other critical policies]. iii. Person 3: “Democracy is a form of government that is run by a president or ruler, but created by the common majority in which the laws and any governance decisions are formulated for the common good of all the citizens who are involved with the elected government.” I define democracy as a government formed by the people in which the common majority or the citizens have supreme power, and they have the ability to exercise their power through a just, free, and fair electoral system. My definition coincides with that of Abraham Lincoln “a government of the people, by the people, and for the people” (Stout 2015, p. 830). My definition takes into consideration the two possible categories of democracy: direct and representative. In the former, the people themselves, without the intermediation of a representative, participate in the making of critical and less critical decisions within the society. Given the intricacies associated with the dynamics of governance, Fraser (2004) notes that direct democracy is only feasible and plausible in systems with few people, for instance, a tribal council or organisation. In such systems, the members can hold a boardroom-like meeting and resolve major issues through majority vote or consensus. It is impossible in the modern-day large government settings given the huge population and the complexities associated with democratically making crucial decisions when everyone is involved. The most common form of democracy in the contemporary world is the representative democracy. In this case, the citizens elect the officials they trust and have them formulate laws and make important decisions on behalf of the citizens who elected them. The officials are expected to advance the common good in every decision they make and every step they take with respect to governance. Drawing from the power vested in them by the people, the elected officials deliberate on complex issues that call for judicious decision-making, complex structures, and undivided attention with limited friction, the type of coordination that is rare to find when everyone is involved in the process of governance of resource management. The election of these officials is not a uniform process and varies from one locality to the other. Even in the individual nations, the election of officials varies through the systems of governance, for instance, provincial, national, or state levels. Regardless of the form of democracy, it is important to note that it is the people that run the government alongside the laws of the land. Given the different ways that people understand democracy, there are some similarities and differences between my definition of democracy and those of the three respondents. Besides, there is no one-size-fits-all criterion on how to define democracy (Schaffer 2014; Munck 2016). However, my definition resonates with the definitions of the first and third respondents. It is agreeable that democratic governments are for the people. In particular, the definitions treat ‘the people’ as an entity or a unit. According to Munck (2016), one of the primary characteristics of democracy is that it treats people equally in the face of the law. Therefore, unitary treatment of citizens (the people) implies that they are equal in the face of the law, and such social elements as discrimination are foreign to democracy. Correspondingly, every vote is equal in terms of weighting (Boehringer 2014). On the same note, both my definition and that of the three respondents acknowledge an existence of the rule of law in a democracy. The second respondent, however, only feebly refers to the rule of law through indication of a ‘legitimate election,’ which, according to Schumpeter (2013), is somewhat impossible without a well-defined and elaborate legal framework. Therefore, all the four definitions of democracy in this discussion recognises the vitality of the rule of law in a democracy. It is one the rule of law the entire concept of democracy balances. The citizens, according to the three definitions, set these laws and expect their representatives to abide and operate by them. An examination of my definition versus the other three reveals particular overt differences. One major difference is that, while my definition encompassed the elements of both representative and direct forms of democracy, all the other three responses mostly alluded to one form democracy, thus, defined the concept partially. Person 1 defined direct democracy while the third person defined representative democracy. The second participant also alluded to the representative form of democracy. In this manner, the respondents left out certain elements that are critical in the definition of democracy and which would be required in the analysis of such concepts related to democracy as freedom (Andersen, Moller and Skaaming 2014). Unlike my definition, the second respondents take a negative view of democracy, which is commonly associated with the representative form of democracy. Shi and Chu (2015) note that the concept of democracy is contemporarily being misused by the elected leaders to advance their individual interests in place of advocating for the common good which falls at the core of actual democracy. The response provides an alternative view and definition of democracy that is not captured in my definition or those of the other two respondents. According to Kolstad and Wiig (2016), this is an elitist view of democracy which primarily views a democratic government as one that is run by a few individuals whose intentions are much far from advancing the common good, but their own good. Notwithstanding the similarities, my view of democracy was different, in at least one way, from those of the other respondents. There are several ways to explain this difference, and the major one is one’s political background. Different regions, nations, states, provinces and levels of governance handle democracy differently. While other nations, for instance, handle democracy judiciously and rank top in practice, others use it as a means of oppressing their citizens (Kolstad and Wiig 2016; Boehringer 2014) and suppressing justice (Weale 2013). There is never a guarantee that a democratic system will work perfectly as a result of the differing opinions among the people, which may lead to the election of illegitimate leaders. Different people elect leaders differently given their personal evaluation of their preferred leader (Vigoda-Gadot and Mizrahi 2014). This divergence of opinion can result in both good and bad leaders with one side likely to influence the other, thus, reorienting the entire direction of a country’s leadership. On that note, people who come from backgrounds where democracy is misused by the leaders have a high chance of taking a negative view of democracy. I think that such a scenario was the source of the definition of the second respondent. It could also be argued that the remaining two participants defined different forms of democracy (direct and representative) since that is what is common in their political backgrounds. Similarly, the participants may have defined democracy in the manner they did, given that there is no consensus concerning the definition of democracy (Geissel, Kneuer and Lauth 2016). Since the respondents were students, they may have drawn these definitions from their learning materials which are guaranteed to differ in terms of definition. Munck (2016) notes that definitions of democracy range from one material to the other and the context in which the material is written alongside the message it intends to convey. Readers of different materials are highly likely to define democracy differently. Conclusively, from this discursive process, I discovered that democracy is a concept that is common yet misunderstood across the board. Besides, the responses of the participants reveal that it is difficult to formulate a single definition of democracy give that the concept is context-specific. That is, localities view and practice democracy differently depending on their political, social, and economic situations. My democratic views are exclusively influenced by how I have witnessed the concept work in my locality, same as those of my respondents. The definition of Person 2 also revealed a critical aspect of democracy- conflicts. In some quarters, democracy has been declared impractical solely based on the complexities built into its fabric (Hill Jr. 2016), like the element of power struggle and elitism. In general, it remains an attractive instrument of governance since it gives more power to the people. References List Andersen, D., Møller, J. and Skaaning, S.E., 2014. The state-democracy nexus: conceptual distinctions, theoretical perspectives, and comparative approaches. Democratization, 21(7), pp.1203-1220. Boehringer, G., 2014. Bringing the State and Corporation to Justice: democratic justice and the potential of Local People’s Tribunals. In International Association of Democratic, 18th Congress s, Brussels, Belgium. Fraser, N., 2004. Institutionalizing democratic justice: Redistribution, recognition and participation. Pragmatism, critique, judgment: Essays for Richard J. Bernstein, pp.125-148. Geissel, B., Kneuer, M. and Lauth, H.J., 2016. Measuring the quality of democracy: Introduction. International Political Science Review, 37(5), pp.571-579. Hill Jr, D.W., 2016. Democracy and the Concept of Personal Integrity Rights. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), pp.822-835. Kolstad, I. and Wiig, A., 2016. Does democracy reduce corruption? Democratization, 23(7), pp.1198-1215. Munck, G.L., 2016. What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy. Democratization, 23(1), pp.1-26. Schaffer, F.C., 2014. Thin descriptions: The limits of survey research on the meaning of democracy. Polity, 46(3), pp.303-330. Schumpeter, J.A., 2013. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge, Abingdon. Shi, T. and Chu, Y.H., 2015. Parties, Elections, Voters and Democracy. Voting in Old and New Democracies, p.193. Stout, M., 2015. Democratic Justice and the Social Contract. Public Administration, 93(3), pp.830-832. Vigoda-Gadot, E. and Mizrahi, S., 2014. Prologue: The conflict between good governance and open democracy: A crisis of trust. In Managing Democracies in Turbulent Times (pp. 1-9). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Weale, A., 2013. Democratic justice and the social contract. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Time to Talk: Democracy Literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Time to Talk: Democracy Literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/politics/2067986-time-to-talk
(Time to Talk: Democracy Literature Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Time to Talk: Democracy Literature Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/politics/2067986-time-to-talk.
“Time to Talk: Democracy Literature Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/politics/2067986-time-to-talk.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Definition of the Democracy Concept

Definition, Association, and the Concepts Surrounding Terrorism

The author of the paper "definition, Association, and the Concepts Surrounding Terrorism" will begin with the statement that terrorism had caused great dilemmas to mankind.... It has been rampant in the news recently.... When one hears of the word 'terrorism', several things would come into one's mind....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Democracy and Citizenship

After all, 'One seldom finds a clear definition of the political.... This paper ''democracy and Citizenship'' tells us that with the advent of the agonistic Democrat, there is more of a focus on intellectual charlatanism, political showboating, glad-handing, and political theater than there has been in the past when it came to the simple categories of opponents, the Democrats versus Republicans.... Now, within its political party, the Democrats have been struggling with the new face of democracy: agonism....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Attention deficit democracy: The paradox of civic engagement

In 'Attention Deficit Democracy', Ben challenges the meaning and definition of 'civic engagement' and offers a systematic analysis of how the misuse of the term in social science can endanger durability of future civic engagement literature as well as the many accolades for scholarly contribution already made.... The central thesis and perhaps mission of the book is educating scholars about the dangers of misrepresenting the concept and definition of civic engagement....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

Understanding the Democratic Peace Theory

From the paper "Understanding the Democratic Peace Theory" it is clear that semi-democracy, new democracy and authoritarian rule are NOT to be considered as true democracies and liberal in nature, rather direct and representative democracy ARE rightfully to be termed as true democracy.... Many researchers have taken examples and tried to prove that democracy might not be in the end the substantial basis that led to the decline in wars....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Democracy and Development: Identifying Existing Relationships

The paper presents the relationships existing between democracy and development as well as the feasibility of nonexistence between them.... The necessity to identify the relationships between democracy and development spawned from the need for ascertaining the strengths and weaknesses of this bond.... This collection is valuable in laying the foundations of the relationship between democracy and development if one is to take the existential stance....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Follow-Up to Concept Analysis Reports

The paper also adapts the definition of Eisenstaedt, 1973.... O'Neill defines Patrimolianism as a concept whereby a leader depends on a group of supporters, who benefit from him, either economically, politically or socially, and in return, they enforce.... he two authors define it as a concept whereby a ruler mismanages the resources of a state, for purposes of acquiring power, and maintaining it (Bach and Mammadou, 2012)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

John Locke's Idea of Democratic Government

In ideal cases, an entire society should have a unified definition of the 'good'.... Different theorists have fronted their definition of a perfect structure of government, this outline presents John Locke's and Plato's ideas.... he common good is a concept in philosophy that refers to the communally accepted 'good'.... The relativity of the concept thus validates the various ideologies and definitions that various theorists devised....
5 Pages (1250 words) Outline

Must Effective Democracy Be Limited to the Nation States

On the political fronts, (Anderson, 2002) democracy is a 'concept or a form of governance, where people have equal voices' on issues affecting their lives and have 'equal contribution to issues that can shape governance policies' and (Anderson 2002) is 'expressed as a numeric value of majority vote of representatives.... The paper "Must Effective democracy Be Limited to the Nation States?... According to Oxford advanced learner's dictionary, democracy is derived from two Greek words, 'demos' that is translated to mean 'people' and 'kratos' that translates into 'rule'....
12 Pages (3000 words) Literature review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us