StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Sentencing Process in America - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Sentencing Process in America" tells that prisons and the justice system have four central goals regarding their operations. They are supposed to deter individuals from committing crimes, hinder those who are likely to commit crimes and bring about the process of rehabilitation…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "The Sentencing Process in America"

Justice System Should the sentencing process be changed? Why or why not? The sentencing process in America not only requires change, it is also being brought under change from various forces. The primary force amongst them is the overcrowded nature of the prison system which is simply unable to handle the load of prisoners which are sent to it through the justice system. For some states such as Nevada, the prisons have become so full that “many are resorting to double-bunks and placing inmates in trailers (Bellisle, 2007, Pg. 1)”. Essentially, prisons and the justice system have four central goals in terms of their operations. They are supposed to deter individuals from committing crimes, they are supposed to incapacitate those who are likely to commit crimes, bring about the process of rehabilitation and finally, to punish those who do not follow the laws of society. However, as discussed by Bellisle (2007), the sentencing system in America seems to focus more on the idea of incarceration and putting people in prisons rather than on rehabilitation and allowing them to become productive members of society. The courts hand out sentences to eighty thousand criminal defendants every year and the number of those who go into prison are far more than those who are released (Richey, 2005). Sentences handed out by courts simply put people away for long periods of time while not looking at the impact it would have on the prison system or even the nature of their crime. Many violations of the law come with mandatory minimum sentences and these sentences can be as long as 10 years for some drug offenses. Instead of allowing a judge to come up with a reasonable idea for how long a person should be put away for smoking marijuana illegally, the laws give mandatory minimum sentences which have to be followed (Bellisle, 2007). The sentencing process could be improved drastically if the judges are trusted to establish their own criteria for punishments equivalent to the crime. Of course, it can be argued that race and ethnicity can creep into the issue when judges are allowed to have a lot of discretion with regard to sentencing but that issue can also be monitored by the higher courts to ensure that the sentencing remains fair and transparent. Undoubtedly, the transparency of the justice system is also hurt by the idea that prosecutors may manipulate the accused to get plea bargains and thus avoid trials in the first place (Murphy, 2004). In certain situations, the laws not only cause the crime to be enhanced in a crime, they may even double the minimum time which is mandated by the law. For example, if a robbery is committed in Vegas where a deadly weapon is used, the minimum sentence is automatically doubled. In essence, for the same crime a person would be incarcerated for double the period. While this system and the sentencing system appears to be tough on crime and is supposed to make the people safe, crime levels still remain high. The only thing the sentencing system seems to be tough on is the budget and the idea of minimum sentences. Discuss the relationships of the prosecutor in the justice system. As described by Hamilton and Word (1973), despite the importance of the prosecutor s/he “is often forgotten in the discussions of the criminal justice system (Hamilton and Word, 1973, Pg. 183)”. This is because the justice system is often limited to the police, the courts and the corrections facilities. However, in terms of the role played by the prosecutor, s/he has to be viewed separately because the function of the prosecutor and the role played by him/her makes the prosecutor more than a government functionary. In fact, the prosecutor “represents a separate and equal branch of government which is intended to be independent of the court (Hamilton and Word, 1973, Pg. 183)”. The role of the prosecutor is to bring evidence relevant to the case and make a presentation before the court where the court can evaluate the evidence to give a decision regard the guilt or innocence of a person. In essence, the prosecutor, the defense and the court itself are all working towards the same goals of seeking out the truth and serving the cause of justice but the directions they take may be different. With regard to the role of the prosecutor with the accused, the prosecutor is supposed to bring evidence that leads to a conviction but the cause of justice is also to protect the innocent. The rights of the accused therefore, have to be upheld by both the prosecutor and the courts themselves as that is the relationship which the prosecutor has with the accused. While the court remains a passive arbitrator between the prosecution and the defense, the prosecutor has to be an active participant in the justice system. This idea of being an active participant also gives a lot of power to the prosecution since in many situations; the power to get plea bargains and confessions may give the prosecutors the ability to avoid trials altogether (Murphy, 2004). Such methods have been questioned and may even be considered unethical by some but that is the responsibility which comes with the power of being a prosecutor. Just as the defense has the right to not take up cases based on their analysis of the case, the prosecutor also has the right to not “accept passively as his workload every matter that is presented to him. He can screen out matters referred to him by police agencies that fail to meet his standards and priorities (Hamilton and Word, 1973, Pg. 183)”. This makes the role of the prosecutor quite strong since s/he can choose which cases to take up depending on the evidence which has been gathered with regard to the case itself. Finally and perhaps most importantly, the prosecutor can initiate and guide investigations towards issues which s/he thinks have value therefore his role towards the police becomes that of an advisor and consultant. Works Cited Bellisle, M. 2007, ‘Sentencing process needs revamping, justices say’, [Online] Available at: http://news.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070214/NEWS07/702140343/0/NEWS Hamilton, W. and Work, C. 1973, ‘The Prosecutors Role in the Urban Court System’, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 183-189. Murphy, S. 2004, ‘Sentencing process flawed, judge says’, [Online] Available at: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2004/06/26/sentencing_process_flawed_judge_says/ Richey, W. 2005, ‘Court orders changes in sentencing’, [Online] Available at: http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0113/p01s02-usju.html Word count: 1,078 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“1.Should the sentencing process in the U. S. be changed Why or why not Essay”, n.d.)
1.Should the sentencing process in the U. S. be changed Why or why not Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1548279-1should-the-sentencing-process-in-the-u-s-be-changed-why-or-why-not-2-discuss-the-key-relationships-of-the-prosecutor-with-others-in-the-criminal-just
(1.Should the Sentencing Process in the U. S. Be Changed Why or Why Not Essay)
1.Should the Sentencing Process in the U. S. Be Changed Why or Why Not Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1548279-1should-the-sentencing-process-in-the-u-s-be-changed-why-or-why-not-2-discuss-the-key-relationships-of-the-prosecutor-with-others-in-the-criminal-just.
“1.Should the Sentencing Process in the U. S. Be Changed Why or Why Not Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1548279-1should-the-sentencing-process-in-the-u-s-be-changed-why-or-why-not-2-discuss-the-key-relationships-of-the-prosecutor-with-others-in-the-criminal-just.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Sentencing Process in America

Sentencing and Corrections System

ccording to Mackenzie (2001), the four essential and fundamental goals attributed to the sentencing process are retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation.... the sentencing principle focused more on incarceration, having greater impact on the total legal structure of the nation.... he process of Incapacitation physically confines the person into prison, providing him no further chance o commit any crime.... This resarch paper "sentencing and Corrections System" discusses social experiments that were failures....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Prison Sentencing Reform-Juveniles

the sentencing has been devised in order to keep the dangerous juvenile criminals away from the society.... the sentencing has been devised in order to keep the dangerous juvenile criminals away from the society.... The author of this paper "Prison sentencing Reform-Juveniles" comments on the issue of prison sentencing in relation to reforming juveniles.... It is, however, a very good way of safeguarding the American society since the maximum sentencing is only done on juvenile offenders whose crimes could attract capital punishment or life imprisonment if they were adults....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Sentencing

Also there are special groups of persons that can be exempted in the sentencing for murder since we have seen that it is still being practiced in some states.... It has been assumed by many that this doctrine had long prevailed as the common law rule in England and was not in cooperated into america up until independence.... United States of america: Cambrige University Press.... United States of america : State University of New York Press....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Sentencing

The principle of proportionately in criminal sentencing is mainly practiced by the Supreme Court of United States of america.... sentencing Explain what is meant by “proportionality” with reference to criminal sentencing Proportionality signifies the procedure, in accordance with which, examination is executed in relation to the punishment sentenced to criminals....
4 Pages (1000 words) Term Paper

Disparities and Sentencing of African Americans

How the sentencing system differs between the African Americans and Caucasians3.... African Americans are considered as the primary decedents of enslaved Africans transported to via slave ships following the sea route known as the Middle passage from west and Central Africa to North america and The Caribbean from 1585 to 1807 during the Trans- Atlantic Slave Trade.... Nowadays the issue regarding the disparities and sentencing of African Americans is a burning topic and hit the headlines....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Racial Disparity In Sentencing

ccording to the sentencing Project (2000) 'Racial disparity in the criminal justice system exists when 'the proportion of a racial/ethnic group within the control of the system is greater than the proportion of such groups in the general population' and that 'Illegitimate or unwarranted racial disparity results from the dissimilar treatment by the criminal justice system of similarly situated people based on race.... ' (the sentencing Project, 2000, p.... If one has to eliminate racial disparity in sentencing one has to change the fundamentals and this necessitates a focused effort from all those who are involved in the judicial process of sentencing....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Rapid Change in Sentencing Processes

The country has adopted a number of changes in the sentencing process to ensure citizens enjoy fair trial in the courts of justice and other correctional facilities.... The country has adopted a number of changes in the sentencing process to ensure citizens enjoy fair trial in the courts of justice and other correctional facilities.... In addition, use of evidence-based research has also enhanced fairness in the sentencing process.... n addition, the decision of the Supreme Court to abolish the mandatory use of federal sentencing guidelines also impacted positively on the sentencing process....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Role of Victims in the Sentencing Process in English Law

Others hold that it is logical for victims to take a significant part in the sentencing process.... Victims often act as some kind of witnesses whose submissions play a role in the verdict and in the sentencing.... n most Common Law jurisdictions, victims present a Victims Impact Statement after the verdict but before the sentencing (Roberts and Erez, 2010 p232).... This is quite problematic because it is likely to influence the sentencing and create a serious issue and influence the decisions which could prove to be unfair to the defendant (Burchell and Milton, 2005)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us