StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

College Athletes Should Not Be Paid - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
"College Athletes Should Not Be Paid" the paper argues that student-athletes may be placed in a bargaining situation that they could not possibly be expected to fully comprehend. Student-athletes would be forced to employ agents, accountants, and attorneys for assistance…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.7% of users find it useful
College Athletes Should Not Be Paid
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "College Athletes Should Not Be Paid"

College Athletes Should Not Be Paid Synopsis of Issues. The payment of money to amateur athletes has traditionally been viewed to be contrary to the very essence and true meaning of amateurism.1 The proposal to pay college athletes who are amateurs poses several legal issues like taxation, labor law, not only to the university but the student athlete as well. The dangers of a pay-for-play system clearly are not limited to the universities. Student-athletes would also face several serious problems. Currently, most universities have standing policies of keeping student-athletes on scholarship if they suffer a career ending injury. Under a business oriented pay-for-play system in which performance is not only expected, but required for payment, such practices would undoubtedly cease. Student-athletes would also be forced to deal with the overwhelming business concerns that come with a professional system. Student-athletes may be placed in a bargaining situation that they could not possibly be expected to fully comprehend. Student-athletes would be forced to employ agents, accountants, and attorneys for assistance.2 Tax Issues. Problems that universities have avoided by preserving amateurism would begin to haunt them under pay-for-play. As one commentator has noted, a costly problem universities would face under pay-for-play would be the loss of their tax exempt status for income derived from athletics.3 Currently, universities pay no federal tax on tuition or other payments attributable to educational activities.4 Like other tax-exempt institutions, universities are taxed only on "unrelated business taxable income."5Unrelated business taxable income is income from a trade or business that is regularly carried on, but is not "substantially related" to the institution's primary purpose.6 The primary purpose of a university is education.7 Currently, college athletics are considered to be substantially related to education. The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") spoke of this relationship in a 1978 IRS technical advice memorandum which extolled the amateur student-athlete as providing justifications for connecting intercollegiate athletics with education. Therefore, if college athletics were to become strictly a commercial venture, with athletes compensated for playing, the IRS most likely could no longer support the idea that athletics are rationally related to education and would tax the earnings derived from such events. This loss of profits due to taxation would significantly lower college revenues and would likely result in less popular sports being discontinued due to lack of funding, as well as the possibility of limiting funds for athlete services such as scholarships, financial aid, and tutoring. Athletes as Employees: Labor Law Issue. A pay-for-play system could also open a Pandora's box for employment claims, including salaries, the right to form unions, and workers' compensation benefits.8 Due to the nature of athletics and the potential for injury, the addition of workers' compensation claims would be especially costly. Student-athletes' entitlement to workers' compensation is generally held to rest upon whether they are "employees" under the applicable workers' compensation law.9 Under the NCAA's current system most courts have held that universities are not liable for injuries suffered by student-athletes under workers' compensation laws10. In support of these holdings the courts have repeatedly pointed to the concept of amateurism.11 These courts reason that because student-athletes are non-compensated amateurs they are not employees and thus are not entitled to workers' compensation.12 If the amateurism policy is abandoned and a pay-for-play system adopted, courts could no longer deny student-athletes workers' compensation benefits because they would be employees. A second justification for paying student-athletes is that they are university employees13. This idea directly conflicts with established principles of amateurism. Consequently, courts are reluctant to alter the dynamics of collegiate athletics and have rejected this argument. Nonetheless, as these courts come to more readily accept the inescapable fact that major-college programs operate as commercial enterprises, they will undoubtedly reconsider their prior decisions.The relationship between employer and employee is contractual. In Rensing v. Indiana State University Board of Trustees,14 the Indiana Supreme Court denied recovery for permanent disability and additional medical expenses to a football player who was rendered a quadriplegic as a result of an injury sustained in practice.15 Specifically, the court denied the existence of an employment contract, finding that the parties lacked the express or implied intent to enter into an agreement.16 In reaching this conclusion, the court gave special weight to the NCAA's amateurism rules. The court reasoned that, "A fundamental policy of the NCAA, which is stated in its constitution, is that intercollegiate sports are viewed as part of the educational system and are clearly distinguished from the professional sports business."17 Apparently, by the Rensing court's reasoning, the NCAA's principles of amateurism preclude it or any of its member institutions from forming the express or implied intent to enter into an employment agreement. Pay-for-Play and Title IX. Pay-for-play proponents base their arguments only on the revenue producing sports of men's basketball and football. In doing so, they ignore Title IX and its gender equity provisions.18 In 1979, Title IX was held applicable to college sports and specifically mandated colleges to provide substantially proportionate opportunities to female athletes.19 Under a pay-for-play system, Title IX might require both male and female athletes to be compensated. Increased cost to universities might then force them to make budget cuts and eliminate less popular sports. Thus, instead of helping college athletes, a pay-for-play system could actually work against them. Such a result is not in the best interests of student-athletes. NCAA Pay Restrictions. The NCAA maintains monetary restrictions on student athletes.20 Also subject to the restrictions are commercial endorsements and opportunities for outside employment.21 The NCAA rule regarding payments to athletes, bylaw 12.1.2, mandates that a student-athlete will be penalized by loss of amateur status and concomitent eligibility through receipt of payment, which under the rule, is classified as encompassing a wide array of specific practices.22 The NCAA rules prohibiting employment are aimed at limiting the opportunity for boosters, alumni, agents or prospective agents to "assist" the student athlete. The rule provides that an athlete on full scholarship may not work during the school year or any time that class is in session.23 NCAA Bylaw 15.2 limits the amount of financial aid a student may receive to "tuition and fees, room and board, and required course-related books."24 The NCAA bylaws specifically include, as sources of funds which must be considered in this amount, "employment during semester or term time."25 Antitrust Questions. Another issue that could arise in the payment of college players is the question of price fixing. Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act provides that: "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal."26 The Supreme Court has long held that only "unreasonable restraints of trade" are proscribed by the Act.27 Some restraints on economic activity are viewed by the Court as so inherently anti-competitive that they are deemed per se illegal. Examples of this type of conduct would be group boycotts, market divisions, tying arrangements, and price fixing.28 I found it repugnant and disturbing that over the last twenty years college athletics have become increasingly commercial. College games are being named after corporate sponsors and the salaries of coaches have grown to astronomical figures. If college athletics wish to continue without paying the college athletes, there must be some changes. First, there must be an end to the commercial exploitation of student-athletes. For example, current NCAA rules allow universities to require student-athletes to display the logo of the team's athletic corporate sponsor on their uniforms. I personally think that this practice transforms student-athletes into walking billboards, and clearly crosses the line between a fair mix of amateurism and commercialization. The purity of the sport and the student-athlete deserve more deep respect. Second, I think that there should be a limit in unnecessary travel that student-athletes must endure in the average season. Teams are consistently traveling thousands of miles to play insignificant nonconference games without any valid reason at all. This practice is expensive and deprives student-athletes of valuable class and study time, which is why they are in school in the first place. Finally, there must be a concerted effort to emphasize the value of college education. The main purpose of the universities - education - has become lost in the hype that surrounds college sports. This must cease. Student-athletes need to be reminded that competing in college athletics is a special opportunity, that it is not a money making venture and that it is not the sole purpose for attending a university. References 15 U.S.C. 1 (1994). Brown, J. Compensation For The Student-Athlete: Preservation Of Amateurism. SPG Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y, 5, 147. Curtis, T. (1995). Wrestling with Title IX Compliance and Men's Sports Programs, Ent. & Sports Law. Ent. & Sports Law, 13, 1, 12. Retrieved March 01, 2008, from www.westlaw.com Davis, T. (1994). Intercollegiate Athletics: Competing Models and Conflicting Realities. Rutgers L.J., 25, 269, 283. Hilborn, H. (1995). Comment, Student-Athletes and Judicial Inconsistency. N.W. U.L. Rev., 89, 741, 777. Jensen, E. (1987). Taxation, The Student Athlete, And The Professionalization of College Athletics. Utah L. Rev., 1987, 35, 58. NCAA Manual & Bylaws. (1990). NCAA. NCAA May Ok Endorsements. (1988, October 17). Sports Inc. Nestel, D. (1992). Athletic Scholarships: An Imbalance of Power Between the University and the Student-Athlete. Ohio St. L.J., 53, 1401, 1402. News. (1988, October 21). Sports Industry News, p. 325. Paterno, J., & Asbell, B. (1989). Paterno By The Book. Riggs, O. (137). The Facade Of Amateurism: The Inequities Of Major-College Athletics,. SPG Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y, 5. Russo, J. (1994, November 15). No Easy Answers in Pay-for-Play. Chi. Trib. Retrieved March 01, 2008, from www.westlaw.com Shropshire, K. (1991). Legislation for the Glory of Sport: Amateurism and Compensation. SETON HALL J. SPORT L., 1, 7, 11. Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911). White Motor Co. v. United States, 372 US 253 (1963). Young, D. (1985). The Olympic Myth of Greek Amateur Athletics. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Debate notes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Debate notes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500509-debate-notes
(Debate Notes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Debate Notes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500509-debate-notes.
“Debate Notes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500509-debate-notes.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Should College Athletes Get Paid

Instructor name Date Should college athletes Get Paid?... college athletes are at a decided monetary disadvantage when compared with non-athlete students and consequently should receive at least a small stipend by the university or NCAA.... Setting aside for the now that college athletes who participate in the more popular sports such as football and basketball earn millions of dollars for their respective college and that non-athletic students gain from these financial benefits as well, athletes, by virtue of their demanding schedule, are deprived of the ability to earn while they learn and because of this reason alone should be compensated somewhat....
4 Pages (1000 words) Term Paper

Should College Athletes Be Paid

The key question posed by many previous reformists is whether college athletes should be paid.... Date: Should College Athletes be paid?... Given the consideration of many factors such as health, behavior, multi-billion dollar industry, moral decay, physical condition, talent and popularity, it stills remains an issue at stake whether student athletes should be paid (Sack & Staurowsky 139).... Student athletes should be get non cash payments from their colleges while if hired by companies they should receive monetary compensation for their time and energy....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Issue Analysis: If College Athletes Should Be Paid

(1) In my opinion College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.... "Issue Analysis: If college athletes should Be Paid" paper analyzes the issue of paying college athletes, one of the most debated topics in college athletics.... His comments elicited mixed reactions with some arguing that college athletes receive more than their fair share through athletics scholarships while others believe schools are exploiting the student-athletes and they should be paid....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

College Athletics. Should college athletes be paid

The increase in income is another reason why students should be paid (Moore, 2013).... In addition, communication is essential in passing the message to the superiors concerning the fact that playing college sport is in fact a part time job and students should be paid for their hours of work.... Sports and Antitrust: Should College Students be paid to Play.... In summation, the paper will illustrate that it indeed is justifiable to pay college athletes. ...
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Should college athletes be paid

here is a body of debaters who argue that College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.... econdly, college athletes are already being paid through scholarships and should not be paid any further than that.... This is a form of payment for college athletes and therefore, colleges should not spend any finances paying them.... This essay evaluates the arguments against and for paying college athletes borrowing from various secondary sources....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

College Athletes Should Be Paid

In as much as this deal seems one-sided, reasons have been provided as to why college students should not be paid.... This paper 'college athletes should Be Paid' will argue that the NCAA has been unfair to college athletes, and since it benefits in many ways from college games, college athletes should receive part of the income just like employee athletes of the body do.... The tussle between the NCAA and the college athletes make headlines in April when the Northwestern University Basketball players presented the National Labor Relations Board with a proposal to form a union....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Paying College Athletes, Good or Bad

ollege athletes should not be paid; there are so many reasons, they can always be facilitated with other incentives.... People in favor of paying college athletes should rather be asking for separate athletic schools, where students can be proper professional future sportsmen; they better not be making students incline towards something other than education.... There have been many debates concerning this issue; whether the students should be paid or not, when everybody else is earning through their games, competitions, and tournaments, etc....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid?... esides, the reason why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid essay is: ... The reason that there are scholarships online is clear proof that students' athletes should not be paid for participating or representing the university.... Most college athletes are scholarship beneficiaries, and they should not be paid for participating in the game.... The fact that athletes are scholarships beneficiaries should not be taken for granted....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us