StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The present paper deals with the issue of voidable agreements and unconscionable contracts. The author highlights the main circumstances that render a contract unenforceable, which include nondisclosure of material facts, misrepresentation, provision of misleading information, fraud etc…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.8% of users find it useful
Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts"

Case Summary on Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts Introduction A voidable contract involves an agreement between two parties considered unenforceable by a court of law under certain circumstances. Those circumstances that render a contract unenforceable include non-disclosure of material facts, misrepresentation, provision of misleading information, fraud, lack of genuine good will by one party, coercion and those agreements involving minors. On the other hand, unconscionable contracts put one party at a disadvantaged position because the other party fails to disclose all material facts during an agreement (Ewan 21).

In proceedings of any case revolving around voidable or unconscionable contracts, a court of law has to check for all the necessary terms that render an agreement voidable prior to making any ruling. Case Summary The following summary of a case in a court of law shows a voidable agreement containing an unconscionable contract. The case in subject involves a minor who purchased a used car from an adult at one hundred and forty dollars. He, the buyer, attempted to return the car after noticing that the main bearing system had malfunctions.

As a result, the buyer informed the seller on the issue, and asserted that repairing the entire bearing system would cost approximately half the purchasing price. Therefore, the minor left the car with the seller and mailed a written notification expressing his dissatisfaction; hence terminating their contract. As a counter action, the adult seller sued the minor buyer for breaching their agreement. After appraising all essential components of the case, the court passed a ruling in favor of the seller on the basis that the contract was not voidable.

The premise provided was that the buyer’s aunt and grandmother not only gave him the money for purchase of the car, but also accompanied him to the venue of transaction. In this first ruling, the seller benefited as a result of misinterpretation of the law on voidable contract. Appellate Ruling The buyer appealed after losing in the first trial. The court of appeal analyzed the provided evidence and determined the case as a voidable contract. The appellate chamber maintained that the transaction surrounding the contract was between a minor and an adult.

This premise holds regardless of whether the minor’s relatives were present during the agreement. Therefore, the court held that participation of both the aunt and the grandmother did not change the law concerning contracts entered between a minor and an adult, especially those agreements involving personal property (Ewan 45). Still on the appellate ruling, the court’s judge also established the underlying contract as unconscionable. This is based on the fact that the seller withheld relevant information from the minor regarding the automobile’s faulty bearing system.

In this context, failure to disclose relevant information about the actual state of a tangible property amounts to unconscionable circumstances in any subsequent agreement. Therefore, the minor signed the contract without prior knowledge of the car’s faulty system. The court maintained its ruling on grounds of unconscionable contract law because the seller had all the bargaining power, thus making the agreement for his own advantage. With respect to evidence, the appeal court substantiated that the transaction was between the minor and the adult seller, and not between the seller and the buyer’s relatives.

In this case, the seller was consciously and fully aware of the minor’s age when the negotiation took place. Therefore, the minor had every right to terminate the contract and transaction upon realizing a disadvantage resulting from the agreement. However, the agreement could still be valid if the seller had agreed to take the burden of paying for repairs on the car’s bearing system. Based on evidence and laws surrounding the case, the court of appeal made a ruling in favor of the minor; hence terming the contract as voidable.

Consequently, the court of appeal reversed the verdict made in the lower court. Conclusion The brief case above shows that many individuals have limited information on the circumstances that makes to be either voidable or unconscionable. Conventionally, the ruling jury has to establish all facts surrounding a contract, and objectively analyze any evidence presented in order to arrive at an informed decision (Ewan 39). In most cases, court rulings that are based on limited evidence and misinformed interpretation of underlying laws subject innocent parties to suffering and loss.

Work Cited Ewan, McKendrick. Contract Law: Text, cases and materials. London: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts Assignment”, n.d.)
Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts Assignment. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1628368-voidable-agreements-and-unconscionable-contracts
(Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts Assignment)
Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts Assignment. https://studentshare.org/business/1628368-voidable-agreements-and-unconscionable-contracts.
“Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts Assignment”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1628368-voidable-agreements-and-unconscionable-contracts.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Voidable Agreements and Unconscionable Contracts

The Impact of Misrepresentation

contracts that involve the aspect of misrepresentation are generally considered to be void as per legal norms.... The author of this paper states that a contract is a particular legal concept wherein two parties enter into an agreement on mutual understanding.... Each of the parties intends to create certain legal obligations between them....
10 Pages (2500 words) Lab Report

US business law cases

Wilson had experience in business and had signed contracts before.... In the past, Wilson had read the contracts before signing them.... Wilson refused, claiming that the lease was unconscionable.... Is the lease unconscionable Answer The contract of lease is unconscionable.... An unconscionable contract is one by which the terms and conditions is tilted in favor of the person who formed the contract, usually a seller....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Public Law in the United Kingdom

The European Communities Act of 1972 was a significant development and through this Act, the UK has in effect, agreed to be bound by the Treaty of Ascension and to acknowledge EU supremacy in law.... … The United Kingdom is a Constitutional monarchy with a bicameral Parliament, comprised of the Houses of Commons and Lords....
28 Pages (7000 words) Essay

Legal Mistakes Issues

In circumstances where one party is aware of the mistake made by the other party and also aware that the mistaken party would not enter into the contract had he been aware of the mistake the enforcement of such a contract would be unfair and unconscionable.... (Restatement of the Law Second, of contracts Section 151) In other words a mistake occurs when there is an erroneous belief with… In this sense the mistake can be either mutual or unilateral.... A unilateral mistake occurs when only one party to the contract makes a mistake at the time of contracting and that mistake is directly related to the (Restatement of the Law Second, of contracts Section 153) Generally a unilateral mistake will not give rise to grounds for rescission of a contract....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Short Legal Questions

The term is also used to refer to the accused person in a case or the respondent in the case.... A petitioner, also known as the plaintiff, in a civil case, is a… This person is responsible for initiating the legal claim.... For example in domestic violence case filed by a wife against the husband, the defendant or the respondent is the husband, the accused, while the wife is the In the United States constitution, the term commerce clause is used to refer to Article 1, Section 8, and Clause 3 of the U....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Application of the Maxims of Equity in the Context of Trusts

In the book, Equity & Trusts written in 2014 by Alastair Hudson, equity is a primary source of modern law; it has considerably retained the characteristics and features of infusing elements of justice or fairness into the justice system in entirety by the mitigation process of… Therefore, it appears that if properly understood, maxims of equity constitute aspects for the judicial determination between unconscionable and conscionable conduct (Pearce and Barr, 2015)....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Australian Regulatory Environment

This proposal "Australian Regulatory Environment" explores plans to set up a business designed to buy and sell used cars.... It is proposed that the business will be owned and operated as a for-profit company.... The business will be set up as a proprietary company.... nbsp;… A number of legal issues will necessarily arise which will relate to consumer protection in relation to the sale of goods, warranties, shareholder interests, directors' duties, fair labour standards, intellectual property protection, raising capital, accounting and tax obligations....
11 Pages (2750 words) Case Study

Economic Duress and Unconscionable Conduct under Australian Laws

This work called "Economic Duress and unconscionable Conduct under Australian Laws" describes a contract that is entered into between parties under duress on the examples of several cases.... The trial judge observed that the appellant bank engrossed in an unconscionable demeanor within the context of Australian general law and had exerted economic coercion or duress.... Thus, the verdict in ANZ v Karam is also vertically pertinent to the elucidation of the unconscionable demeanor provisions, which is available under the Australian Securities and Investment Commissions Act 2001(Cth) and in the Trade Practices Act, 1974 which imposes the general law dogma of unconscionability....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us